Australia: erasing the evidence

Just like many other countries

The Australian Actuaries Institute [1] has published its latest report on mortality.

They are using a “new conceptual framework” whereby they now measure excess mortality relative to 2023, not to “pre-pandemic” years.

They also say:

As our baseline measurement for 2024 differs from that for earlier years, the measurement of the excess for earlier years is not comparable to that for 2024. Therefore, we have only shown 2024 on this chart. 

So not showing earlier years on the same chart – really?

Note also that, unlike our baselines for previous years, which were based on the absence of a pandemic, the 2024 baseline includes allowance for deaths from COVID-19, which is, given the newness of COVID-19 as a cause of death, a much more approximate estimate than other potential causes of mortality, with the need to estimate both the timing and severity of waves of COVID-19.

It’s notable that the word vaccine doesn’t appear in this report at all.

You’d have thought they would at least deserve a mention – if only to comment on whatever effect on “covid” mortality the miracle injections were having and were projected to have.

Are they basically hiding increased mortality from the mRNA injections by attributing them to covid, for which they predict ongoing deaths?

I thought the vaccines were meant to save people from dying from “covid”?

They seem to want it both ways…to claim there is ongoing excess mortality from “covid” whilst also avoiding mention of the fact that the vaccines haven’t worked. [2]


Notes

  1. A supposedly independent professional body – though we have all seen how such institutions have become captured over the past few years, spewing out an endless series of pro-establishment drivel.
  2. Not that there was anything for them to have worked against. Vaccines don’t work against policy-induced maltreatment, mistreatment, neglect, abuse and euthanasia protocols.

Originally published on Sanity Unleashed

Author

Jonathan started his career in clinical medicine. After a few years, he moved into the Pharma Industry, designing and running an international clinical trial program, before he and a colleague spotted a gap in the market for a company utilising IT to automate several clinical trial processes. The company they founded was sold, it had 6 offices worldwide and 500 employees. Jonathan then retrained as a lawyer, but having missed the commercial world he invested in several Healthcare start-ups, one of which (involved in cancer diagnostics) he now chairs.

Publisher’s note: The opinions and findings expressed in articles, reports and interviews on this website are not necessarily the opinions of PANDA, its directors or associates.

Scroll to Top

INDEPENDENT INSIGHT REQUIRES INDEPENDENT FUNDING

As a non-profit organisation, PANDA’s work remains free of bias and conflicts of interest. Support our work with a monthly donation which aids our planning and resources, and enables societies that are healthy, functioning and resilient.. We rely on your financial support to keep the conversation open.

We value your privacy

We use cookies and similar technologies to improve your experience of our website, to collect anonymous statistics, and to keep our site reliable and secure.By clicking “Accept,” you consent to the use of cookies on this site. For more information, see our privacy policy.

We Rely On Your Financial Support

Every donation helps us to continue discovering, exploring, planning, reaching and impacting.