12 min read The proposed WHO instruments for pandemics and health emergencies would fundamentally change the relationship between the WHO, its Member States, and their populations, promoting a fascist and neo-colonialist approach to healthcare and governance.
10 min read Our new rulers are motivated by something altogether different – a desire to subvert and weaken nature itself, and thus create a technocratic elite.
11 min read The proposed amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations implications for individual and national sovereignty
4 min read A major concern is that the WHO’s infodemic research agenda lacks earnest discussion on where health authorities’ own choices and guidelines contribute to ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’ and even ‘malinformation’.
6 min read by Dr David Bell | When an organ within the body of society becomes as corrupted as self-perpetuating public health has, and proves itself unwilling to reform, society must excise the diseased tissue before it spreads.
7 min read by Dr David Bell | Past authoritarian approaches relied heavily on revising history to lend credence to their claims. In this article, David Bell imagines how that alt-history might sound.
6 min read by Dr David Bell | Public health concerns the public, and the improvement of their health. Yet recently this area of specialisation has been widely attacked for promoting job losses, economic collapse, increased mortality, and the loss of freedoms. There is a way out of this.
9 min read by Chris Waldburger | Part 1 | The power structures of liberal states depended on a credibility created by the valorizing of neutral, transcendent science. Science had eclipsed religion and superstition, and thus a political order of pragmatic science somehow overcame politics.
7 min read by Dr David Bell | The subversion of health for profit runs contrary to the entire ethos of thepost-World War Two anti-fascist, anti-colonialist movement. When people across politics can acknowledge this reality, they can put aside the false divisions that this corruption has sown
7 min read by Dr Piers Robinson | Freedom of expression is evaporating, evident in censorship during Covid-19, whilst now we see the emergence of online safety/harm legislation that might further curtail freedom of speech. But who has been responsible for the lion’s share of propaganda?
