One Nation Under Mind Control | Jason Christoff
< 1 min read Mind control is more simple than one could imagine and more effective than one would think. Media coercion and mind control researcher, Jason Christoff, reveals the tricks that hook you.
< 1 min read Mind control is more simple than one could imagine and more effective than one would think. Media coercion and mind control researcher, Jason Christoff, reveals the tricks that hook you.
< 1 min read A peek into the seedy network of the censorship-industrial-complex, and how actors weave a cloak of respectability through association with academia and official agencies, as they manoeuvre the revolving doors of power.
6 min read It is increasingly apparent that people’s day-to-day lives are being shaped by a global elite that reside outside of our democratic systems. And our experiences strongly suggest that these powerful actors are repeatedly deploying nudges.
22 min read During the UK Parliamentary debate on the WHO Treaty there was a noticeable contrast between those supporting the petition and those opposing it. This article analyses the arguments made by those rejecting the petition, drawing on insights from Behavioural Science.
< 1 min read What’s next for the global reset agenda? How do we recognize the major patterns of deception?
< 1 min read The Covid event has unlocked discussion on a whole range of previously taboo subjects. Hugo Kruger outlines some of these topics.
< 1 min read The astonishing history of a Lyme disease outbreak that medical science writer Kris Newby uncovered after she and her husband developed the debilitating tick-borne disease.
12 min read Symbols have long been used to organize a mass following, to agitate emotions, alter perceptions, and to integrate populations into a particular programme.
2 min read In this Open Society Session, Prof Tim Noakes shares the full story of the case brought against him and explains how he experienced the “cancel culture” that threatened his stellar career.
4 min read A major concern is that the WHO’s infodemic research agenda lacks earnest discussion on where health authorities’ own choices and guidelines contribute to ‘misinformation’, ‘disinformation’ and even ‘malinformation’.