Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History – Part 1 | Roman Bystrianyk
< 1 min read How much do we really know about the history of disease, vaccines and public health? How much does the establishment want us to know?
< 1 min read How much do we really know about the history of disease, vaccines and public health? How much does the establishment want us to know?
8 min read There are substantial differences between “viral spike” and “vaccine spike”. This article explains the science behind the differences.
5 min read Humans’ natural capacities for reasoning and speech mean that politics should be based on persuasion, not censorship, and that government should be based on consent, not coercion.
10 min read A recent article about growing vaccine hesitancy in the US, and how to counter it, relies on certain assumptions about vaccines and their efficacy. This article looks at some of these claims.
< 1 min read With a population of under 2 million, Northern Ireland provides an important case study to understand the true impact of the “vaccination” campaign.
2 min read Hedley Rees explains how the fragmented supply chain for new pharma products has disrupted the time-tested practices that were key to drug safety.
< 1 min read Liberal democracies were turned upside down to “protect health services”. Billions were forced to accept the Covid injections. How were mandates allowed? How could the medical profession forsake their legal and ethical obligations?
12 min read One goal of databases such as VAERS is to eliminate background ‘noise’ from random events. What percentage of the reports can be linked to the Covid injections? PANDA’s inquiry into excess deaths continues.
12 min read This continuation of our inquiry into the drivers of excess deaths digs a little deeper into the vaccination data to see how many lives the Covid vaccines saved.
6 min read Due to the importance of the issue of Covid-19 vaccinations to society at large, PANDA calls on Lancet to retract a seminal paper that is demonstrably incorrect in its assumptions.